To be, or not to be a self-managed staffing program, that is the ...

October
21
2011

To be, or not to be a self-managed staffing program, that is the question!

Posted by: Jon Grosso

managed staffing services

Along with some of my colleagues, I recently attended the 2011 Contingent Workforce Strategies Summit. It was an excellent conference that once again brought together the supplier ecosystem, mature managed staffing program sponsors, and a surprisingly large contingent of prospective first-generation program sponsors seeking advice on the who, what, and where of the managed staffing landscape.

I attended a lot of panel discussions at the event, but the one discussion that stuck out in particular was the one that debated the merits of a self-managed MSP versus an externally managed staffing program. This session was full to capacity and teeming with a buzz unlike any other.

One might think that this session was only for experts, those on their second or third MSP generation, or those with very large spend to manage. But it wasn’t. The session included every variation you could imagine — small and large spend, first- and third-generation programs, local and regional programs, global ones, etc.

To me, the most interesting aspect of the session was the group of mid-sized programs — $30 million to $60 million — that were interested in learning more about self-managed programs, and were doing so for the very first time. This indicates a potentially huge swing in our industry.

As I discussed this topic with other service providers in the airport as we all prepared to depart, and with program sponsors from both ends of the philosophic spectrum, I have concluded that there are seven major questions to consider when making the decision to be a self-managed or externally managed staffing program:

  1. How complex is your program in terms of geographic scope, skill mix, number of supplies, current control over hiring manager and supplier relationships, etc.?
  2. Is your company culture slanted toward outsourcing or in-sourcing? (Every company has a DNA-level preference toward one or the other.)
  3. Do you have executive sponsorship, and if so, and what level? (Executives can influence other decision makers.)
  4. Are you willing, and do you have the competencies, to be held to the same SLA standards to which you would hold an external provider?
  5. Can you bring the same number and level of resources to bear as an external provider can?
  6. Does your organization possess managed-service expertise as a core competency?
  7. What are other organizations in your industry doing to solve similar business problems?

Go and debate this topic among your colleagues and trusted service providers, and let me know your perspective. I have a feeling this topic will continue to be a polarizing one for quite a while.




  assess-workforce-composition-banner




 
Tags: , ,
  • Matt G.

    Hamlet (I mean Jon) – do you think the potential trend of bringing the programs “in-house” has to do more with a perceived cost savings or with a lack of satisfaction with the large players in our industry that have tended to “commoditize” MSP’s?   I think the challenge of mature MSP’s is to continue to innovate, keep the program fresh, and continue to add value throughout the process.  Without that, client’s seem to be starting to think “why can’t we just do this ourselves”?  At that point you will find a client that doth protest too much! 

  • http://blog.yoh.com Jon Grosso

    Matt, Thanks for the comment. There are any number of reasons why an internal corporate team would think a self managed program would be best for their company.  I agree with your perspective that continually adding value is the key to any evolving partnership–whether the partnership is internally or externally based.  It’s all about scalability and the ability to provide the same (if not better) level of service regardless of the program’s ever-changing dynamics. That’s where I see the challenges across most programs –new geographies, different skill set mix, ensuring attention during spikes and focus during lulls, etc. That is why, to me, it’s best to identify an external partner who can deliver a solution set that is battle tested on a wide variety of experiences in the marketplace.  That is value!

  • Pradeep C

    Considering staffing is typically not a core competency of a company, it would always make sense to use an MSP/outsourced vendor who has the expertise/ infrastructure to manage yours and a whole host of other companies on a shared basis at a lower cost than you could by yourself. (Think UPS/FedEx) Costs cant be high as long as there are competitors, so the only reason I can think such back and forth debates happen is the Procurement guy has to justify his job and ‘do’ something. Once the savings for moving to an MSP are claimed- nest year- move it back inhouse- and claim the fees saved as new savings..

Follow us:

  •  
    More in Professional Staffing Services, Workforce Strategies (185 of 528 articles)